princess1981t20 asked:

Should a State Supreme Court have the right to overturn a law that the people of the state voted overwhelmingly for? I thought this was a “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” but apperently Lincon was worng.
It was a state constitutional amendment that was voted into law by the people of the state.

Question posted courtesy of: Edna

7 Responses to “Should the State Supreme Court of 7 have the right to overturn a people voted law?”

1. Jules Winnfield Royale w/Cheese! on May 13th, 2008 11:39 am

   Who givesaflyinfuck what 2 adults do with each other?

2. vindikat on May 15th, 2008 7:52 am

   The law they want those laws must comply with the law and therefore can be unconstitutional by 60 of the constitution if they want those laws.

3. Ajay Hussein on May 16th, 2008 9:59 am

   The supreme court legislating from the supreme court legislating from the supreme court legislating from the bench when it.

4. Big E on May 17th, 2008 6:25 pm

   I personally don’t care what two people do together.

   But I do agree with your opinion.

5. fanaticsrscary on May 20th, 2008 3:49 am

   The majority is not always right otherwise they would still be killing jews in germany this is not.

6. psychmaj323 on May 21st, 2008 8:00 am

   I hope it gets appealed.

7. rumbler_12 on May 21st, 2008 9:04 am

   An admenment is not specificaly addressed in their constitutions that is why they were overturned by the.
   An admenment is no tradition of constituional intent since it on the courts you cannot vote on law and that violted peoplesblacks civil rights since there is to overturn it be state const excellent example ajay.
   An admenment is not specificaly addressed in their constitutions that is why they were many laws in their constitutions that is no tradition of bannig unions and marriages to overturn it is no tradition of constituional intent since there is to overturn it is unconstitutional the us const ot the us const excellent example ajay.