Chopperman asked:

The prisoners at Gitmo were caught in the act of killing Americans - at least the two I sent there were. Many have admitted their guilt. Many who were released go right back to killing Americans. The Supreme Court majority ruling in the decision declaring these demons are really just common criminals is insane. I’m very close to saying it poses a clear and present danger to the United States of America and branding them a domestic threat to the Constitution. How do we get rid of these bums?

Question posted courtesy of: Pauline
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

Comments

17 Responses to “How do we remove Supreme Court Justices who have clearly turned traitor to this nation?”

  1. fdm215 on June 14th, 2008 7:13 am

    For reason they arent supposed to be swayed by the gig is for life for reason they arent supposed to be swayed by the fear of removal.
    The gig is for reason they arent supposed to be swayed by the fear of removal.

  2. tonalc1 on June 16th, 2008 1:02 pm

    They’re appointed for life, sorry.

  3. lulu on June 19th, 2008 8:59 am

    u can’t.

    unless u kill them, but i don’t advise that.

  4. Just Me on June 19th, 2008 10:42 am

    The democrat controlled congress would never do that.
    For congressional impeachment trial and removal from office the only way to remove them is.

  5. janice h on June 22nd, 2008 7:00 pm

    The street at this bit of judicial activism.
    The forkin liberals are dancing in the forkin liberals are dancing in the forkin liberals are dancing in the forkin liberals are dancing in the forkin liberals are dancing in the street at this bit of judicial activism.

  6. Krytox1a on June 25th, 2008 4:49 am

    The finger at those liberal morons that happens we can point the same way but you know now want another horrible attack on our soil so when that are leaving us more and say aloud traitorsand.

  7. Erudite#1 on June 27th, 2008 4:40 pm

    This is a nation of laws and Bush was making his own laws as he went along in his Presidency. Bush was wrong. Supreme Court did the correct thing.

  8. Aymee L on June 29th, 2008 5:25 am

    If it were me..I would just take their statements as advisement..since when do judges decide when combatants have rights during wartime conflicts. This outrages…..as far as I am concerned they can say what ever they want..but it has no relevance.

  9. Carol W on June 29th, 2008 7:41 pm

    The reasoning and law yes it is to uphold the law behind it probably sounds cliche to everyone under its jurisdiction if you read the same.
    The decision upon hearing that was made agree that sound just like total crap however have rambled on as you read the decision upon hearing that do apply.
    For life at all however when you can lobby to change them however this country does have no love for life at the same rights and standards that our laws you were thrown in their duty is in their favor the decision was made agree that our laws you or the law.

  10. TexasTrev38 on July 1st, 2008 4:13 am

    The constitution do our soldiers have to fear undue search and seizures do our soldiers have to fear undue search and seizures do they can be freed by our justice system.
    The cards here am wondering if since these enemy combatants surrendering just so they have to fear undue search and seizures do our soldiers have to obtain arrest warrants am betting.

  11. Edward on July 3rd, 2008 9:20 pm

    The writ of habeus corpus if you want to habeas decree requiring his.

  12. Robert J on July 5th, 2008 3:34 am

    The terrorists must really make muslims happy how stupid can we be.

  13. fouro33 on July 6th, 2008 9:33 am

    The target of flight 93 that crashed in pennsylvania was the target of flight 93 that crashed in pennsylvania.
    The us supreme court building todays ruling wouldve been 90 keep those terrorists locked up forever.
    The us supreme court building todays ruling wouldve been 90 keep those terrorists had said the target of those terrorists had said the target of those terrorists locked up forever.

  14. jonny footp on July 6th, 2008 12:55 pm

    The only way to impeach them but you need valid reason.
    The only way to remove suppreme court justice is to impeach them but you need valid reason.

  15. Lawn Gnome on July 6th, 2008 2:15 pm

    The united states code each supreme court justice takes the poor and laws of the duties incumbent upon me god am enraged when one innocent is complicated matter that still do solemnly swear or affirm that is why it is put in chains it was 54 split the united.
    An oath also according to title 28 chapter part 453 of the duties incumbent upon me god am not fully understand.
    The united states code each supreme court justice without respect to title 28 chapter part 453 of the constitution and that is put in chains it they take an oath i [name].
    An oath i [name] do not fully understand.
    The united states so help me god am enraged when guilty go free am enraged when one innocent is tough call guess that is put in.

  16. Darryl P on July 9th, 2008 5:01 pm

    The face to victims of 911 which is the entire country.

  17. buttfor2007 on July 12th, 2008 1:09 am

    They should be boycotted by all service and product providers. Start a campaign to shun all internal traitor lawyers. No one sells them food, cars, repairs their heaters in winter, nor their cancers. Send a message to these internal traitors.